Comparison Shootout: Ktm Duke 200 Vs Pulsar 200 Ns Vs Cbr250R
#31
Posted 14 July 2012 - 11:14 PM
#32
Posted 15 July 2012 - 05:54 PM
And it does leave behind the question if the 35K premium for Duke is justifiable...
My two cents
1. Duke - If you prefer the brand and the riding is more city biased
2. NS - If you want a does it all, VFM package...
Had a chat with someone who did a solo ride on the Duke. He echoed about the stifness of the suspension of the Duke! The NS however wasnt spongy like the P220, but it wasnt as harsh as the duke either!
Life is tough, only to make you tougher!
Ride right, Ride safe, and Ride hard!
#33
Posted 16 July 2012 - 11:59 AM
satyenpoojary, on 15 July 2012 - 05:54 PM, said:
And it does leave behind the question if the 35K premium for Duke is justifiable...
My two cents
1. Duke - If you prefer the brand and the riding is more city biased
2. NS - If you want a does it all, VFM package...
Had a chat with someone who did a solo ride on the Duke. He echoed about the stifness of the suspension of the Duke! The NS however wasnt spongy like the P220, but it wasnt as harsh as the duke either!
For it goes like this...now I have been riding the CBR now for the past 6 months and my earlier bike the ZMA. And with the soft and lovely suspension on bad roads- I will find the NS obviously on the stiffer side
Talking about early days- I just had this query, if in the early days of a bike is supposed to be slightly on the gruff/ vibey side- how come our press goes gaga over its smoothness? Coz if someone like me says its vibey- everyone will jump and say running-in running-in. Does the press/other media get run-in'd bikes?
#34
Posted 16 July 2012 - 12:37 PM
arn, on 14 July 2012 - 12:50 AM, said:
Lastly, mentioned in the motoroids article reply (not here) , the low end torque vis a vis the ZMA - the ZMA isn't even close. The ZMA doesn't shudder when you try to pull at 2.5K rpm because ...it isn't pulling!. The CBR will be. Once it gets to 3 - 3.5K rpm, it's a no contest thereafter. Besides should anybody actually be riding at 2 and 2.5K? How's the low end torque at 3.5K on the NS and KTM, that's what rules the city, not torque at 7000rpm
Inclination of the windscreen I completely agree. But I had this problem on the ZMA when riding at high speeds- there used to be lot of drag on the knees and legs- and I had to keep them tucked in- with time it used to get uncomfortabe, which doesn't happen on the CBR. I find the windrag on the CBR mostly on the helmet. When I go flat out- I just duck in a bit- not crouch completely and there is a drastic reduction in drag.
#35
Posted 16 July 2012 - 02:49 PM
Life is tough, only to make you tougher!
Ride right, Ride safe, and Ride hard!
#36
Posted 16 July 2012 - 02:52 PM
~A Motorcycle cant sing in the streets of a City~
My Personal Snaps and Videos Web Album
My Private Site for my Rides, Drives and Craziness
My Youtube Channel
Blood Group- B-ve:D Attitude- B+ve:D:D
#37
Posted 16 July 2012 - 03:27 PM
Silver Phantom, on 16 July 2012 - 02:52 PM, said:
Many a times to impress people who you don't like..
#38
Posted 16 July 2012 - 03:29 PM
satyenpoojary, on 16 July 2012 - 02:49 PM, said:
I think Amit can clarify this. When we got the P200 (first gen) at Chakan..they were fresh off the assembly line and we thrashed the daylights out of the bikes. And as far as I know the press are never given the testing bikes that we see on the highway (spy pics)- so to get 2000 kms by just doing laps of Chakan is a big task to ask for.
@CV: Bhai tu chalaake dekh and then make a decision! Though I very well know what would suit you
#39
Posted 16 July 2012 - 03:35 PM
rahul_rn, on 16 July 2012 - 03:27 PM, said:
Many a times to impress people who you don't like..
Please Review your Finances, and PRevious Loan Burdens, and Retry After a Few Years...
pulsurge, on 16 July 2012 - 03:29 PM, said:
@CV: Bhai tu chalaake dekh and then make a decision! Though I very well know what would suit you
Arey koi agar uski bike mereko Ghat mein Chalaney ko dey toh try and decide karu.. Saala Dealer Test Rides dont go for more than a few 100mtrs.. thats it.. for me to really decide on a bike, i need to ride it in the Ghats, where i know i will be spending most of my time during rides.
anyone up to lend me thier bikes for a short duration of a ghat.?!?!
~A Motorcycle cant sing in the streets of a City~
My Personal Snaps and Videos Web Album
My Private Site for my Rides, Drives and Craziness
My Youtube Channel
Blood Group- B-ve:D Attitude- B+ve:D:D
#40
Posted 16 July 2012 - 03:52 PM
#41
Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:24 PM
arn, on 16 July 2012 - 03:52 PM, said:
~A Motorcycle cant sing in the streets of a City~
My Personal Snaps and Videos Web Album
My Private Site for my Rides, Drives and Craziness
My Youtube Channel
Blood Group- B-ve:D Attitude- B+ve:D:D
#42
Posted 19 July 2012 - 03:36 PM
Owners and potential owners boast of the features on the KTM Duke - Fuel Injection, USD forks by WP, sporty looking tank, Digital Instrument Console displaying hordes of info, etc. Frankly the USD forks are made in India by Endurance under license from WP. The suspension setup is too stiff and Bajaj should eventually o do some R&D to make the suspension a bit more "Indian" street friendly. The sporty looking fuel tank is of little significance since its capacity is limited to only 10.5 liters. The FI system makes matters worse here by setting aside a mandatory reserve of approx 2 to 2.5 litres for smooth functioning of the submersible fuel pump, which brings down the usable tank capacity to just 8-odd litres. Even if the rider manages a 35 kmpl, the maximum tank range will still be restricted to just 270-280 litres. This isn't great news for hard -core tourers coz lack of sufficient tank range and adulterated fuel available at many highway petrol bunks is going to make matters worse for the Duke's engine and FI system. An increase in tank capacity by offering an alternative 17-20 litre tank will be very helpful for the tourers.
I am in total alliance with the fact that the KTM Duke 200 is a machine that boasts of international standards incorporated by automotive giants in developed countries, but road and weather conditions prevailing in India is way different from that in Europe.
In the light of my above mentioned observations, my opinion is that the Pulsar 200NS is the best bet on Indian roads. The 200NS handles as good as the Duke, top sspeed is more-or-less similiar to the Duke and rider/pillion comfort is superb on it.The Duke has a seat which can only witness a supermodel sit comfortably as pillion, even an average size Indian lady/man will find it tough to remain seated on the Duke for long rides.
People who are super impressed with the Duke's acceleration must remember that the 200NS also accelerates very well if not better than the Duke. The adavntage of a carb (which does its duty on the Pulsar 200 NS) is that it can be up-jetted along with increasing air intake (K&N Air Filter) will result in substantial increase in acceleration (will make the 200NS quicker than both stock Duke and CBR). Best part is to improve performance on a Pulsar 200NS, one does not need to spend anything above Rs. 3-4K for the K&N filter and a larger main/pilot jet for the carb. After carrying out the above mentioned mods, the owner will still have buffer cash remaining for a good Free Flow Exhaust and Sprockets(if need be)........
But on a fuel injected bike like Duke or CBR, any attempts towards performance enhancement will entail greater expenditure to the tune of Rs. 15-20K just for a remapped ECU and a Free Flow Air Filter and maybe a Free Flow Exhaust (read Akrapovic).
So it makers a lot more sense in spending one's hard-earned money on the Pulsar 200 NS as it is "Bang for Buck"; delivers race-track performance as good as the KTM Duke and has touring capabilities close to the heels of the CBR.
If you want the best of both worlds.........go for the Pulsar 200NS
#43
Posted 19 July 2012 - 05:38 PM
#44
Posted 19 July 2012 - 06:53 PM
pulsurge, on 19 July 2012 - 05:38 PM, said:
Hi. Just that the cost of modification for power enhancement is more in case of a fuel injected bike like the CBR as compared to a Pulsar 200NS which is operating on a carb. BTW the free flow silencer, carb upjet and K&N had worked pretty well on my RE Machismo 500 but yes it does lead to reliability issues, not worth the effort. I see every other rider pitching hard for the Duke and the CBR but hardly anybody for the Pulsar 200NS which by all means is definitely quick and comfortable to ride on city roads, highways and on the race track. In fact in my opinion, comfort and ease of riding for long hours at sustainable triple digit speeds is what the Pulsar 200NS brings on the plate at a very reasonable price.
#45
Posted 19 July 2012 - 07:18 PM
Also tagged with ShootoutKTM Duke 200, Pulsar 200 NS, Honda CBR250R
![]() |
Knowledge Base →
Motoroids - Member Reveiws →
Bumblebee ~ Pulsar 200 Ns ~ ReviewStarted by binilvarghese, 06 Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Knowledge Base →
Do it Yourself - Modifications etc →
Paddock Stand For Honda Cbr250RStarted by pulsurge, 17 Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Knowledge Base →
Do it Yourself - Modifications etc →
Rear Disc Pad Options For The Honda Cbr250RStarted by pulsurge, 02 Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Cars and Bikes →
Motorsport →
Honda Cbr250R Gets Race KitStarted by pulsurge, 15 Jun 2012 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Knowledge Base →
Motoroids - Member Reveiws →
Honda Cbr250R: 13,000 Kms Ownership ExperienceStarted by pulsurge, 08 Jun 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








